Trusted by 70+ CPA Firms

Controls Testing Shouldn't Consume Your Entire Audit Budget

Control design evaluation, operating effectiveness testing, deficiency documentation, and remediation validation – executed by trained offshore teams with structured test plans.

400+
Controls Tested Annually
Multi-Framework
Expertise
55–65%
Cost Savings

Controls testing is the most labor-intensive phase of every audit

Controls testing consumes up to 50% of total audit hours, yet most of that time is spent on repetitive documentation, sample selection, and evidence gathering – not on evaluating control effectiveness or advising clients on remediation.

Labor Intensity

Controls testing is the most time-consuming audit phase, consuming up to 50% of total engagement hours on documentation and evidence gathering.

Senior Time Drain

Sample selection and test documentation consume senior-level time that should be spent on deficiency evaluation and client guidance.

Tracking Failures

Deficiency tracking falls through the cracks when testing is rushed, creating compliance gaps and missed remediation deadlines.

SOX Bottlenecks

SOX 404 testing deadlines create annual bottlenecks that strain every audit team and push other engagements to the back burner.

The Real Cost of In-House Controls Testing

$85K+Average cost per U.S. controls testing specialist
50%Of total audit hours typically spent on controls testing
30–50Average controls tested per engagement
60%Of control deficiencies related to documentation, not design
Calculate Your Savings →

Full-Cycle Controls Testing Execution

Everything from control design evaluation to remediation validation – handled by U.S.-trained offshore teams with structured test plans.

Control Design Evaluation

Assessment of control design adequacy to determine whether controls are properly designed to prevent or detect material misstatements.

Control design walkthroughs
Design gap identification
Compensating control assessment

Operating Effectiveness Testing

Testing whether controls operate as designed throughout the audit period through inspection, observation, reperformance, and inquiry.

Inspection & reperformance
Sample-based testing execution
Test results documentation

Sample Selection & Documentation

Statistical and non-statistical sample selection with proper documentation of methodology, population, and selection criteria.

Sample size determination
Statistical sampling methods
Population documentation

Deficiency & Gap Analysis

Identification and classification of control deficiencies including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses with root cause analysis.

Deficiency classification
Root cause analysis
Severity assessment

Remediation Validation Testing

Testing of remediated controls to confirm that deficiencies have been properly addressed and controls now operate effectively.

Remediation plan review
Re-testing execution
Validation documentation

SOX 404 Testing Support

Specialized testing support for Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) assessments.

ICFR scope determination support
Key control identification
Management assessment support

Your Controls Testing Team in 3 Weeks

A proven onboarding process that integrates offshore testing specialists into your audit methodology – without disrupting active engagements.

1

Discovery Call

We learn your testing methodology, control frameworks, client types, and documentation standards.

2

Team Assembly

We match testing specialists with experience in your control frameworks and industry verticals.

3

Methodology Training

Your team trains on your test templates, sampling standards, and documentation requirements.

4

Pilot Engagement

Start with 3–5 engagements with controls testing. We execute the tests, you evaluate results. Scale when ready.

Most firms complete onboarding in 2–3 weeks and scale to full controls testing capacity within 60 days.

In-House vs. Accountably

The average U.S. controls testing specialist costs $75K–$85K in salary alone. Add benefits, payroll tax, CPE, supervision, and turnover – you're looking at $95K–$115K fully loaded per head. Multiply that by the number of engagements requiring controls testing, and the cost becomes the single largest audit line item.

ComparisonU.S. In-House StaffAccountably
Senior Controls Specialist (Annual)$85,000 – $105,000$32,000 – $42,000
Staff Controls Analyst (Annual)$60,000 – $75,000$22,000 – $30,000
Time to Productivity3–6 months2–3 weeks
Multi-Framework ExperienceVaries✓ Standard
Multi-Layer QC Built In✗ Not included✓ 4-tier review
Backup Coverage✗ No coverage✓ Always covered
Testing Completion SLANo guarantee✓ 5–7 business days
Turnover RiskHigh – 35% avg✓ 98.7% retention

We Work Inside Your Controls Testing Software

Our teams train on your tech stack during onboarding – no migration needed.

A
AuditBoard

AuditBoard

Certified Team
C
CaseWare

CaseWare

Certified Team
W
Workiva

Workiva

Certified Team
X
Excel

Excel

Certified Team
W
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer TeamMate

Trained Team
G
Galvanize

Galvanize (Diligent)

Trained Team
+

+ Any Other

We'll Train
Your testing software not listed? Request integration support here
Case Study
120Engagements with controls testing
$98KAnnual savings
3Offshore testing specialists
40%Faster testing completion
Get Similar Results →

How Apex Audit Group Eliminated Controls Testing as Their Audit Bottleneck

Apex Audit Group's controls testing was the bottleneck in every audit engagement. Senior staff spent weeks on sample selection, test execution, and documentation – leaving deficiency evaluation and client remediation guidance for the final days of the engagement. Accountably deployed three offshore testing specialists who took over sample selection, execution, and documentation. Within one busy season, testing completion accelerated by 40%, and seniors reclaimed their time for the judgment-intensive work that clients actually value.

"Controls testing used to be our biggest headache. Now it's our most efficient audit phase."

– Karen Apex, Managing Partner

Common Questions

Everything you need to know about our offshore internal controls testing services.

We follow your firm's specific testing methodology and documentation standards. Our teams are trained on PCAOB AS 2201 (for integrated audits), AICPA AU-C 315 and AU-C 330 (for non-issuer audits), and COSO 2013 Internal Control Framework. We adapt to your specific approach – whether you use attribute sampling, statistical sampling, or professional judgment-based selection.
Sample sizes are determined based on your firm's sampling methodology. We support both statistical and non-statistical approaches, following AICPA sampling guidance and your firm's internal standards. Population characteristics, control frequency, and desired confidence levels are documented for each sample. Your engagement team approves all sample sizes before testing begins.
Every test workpaper is designed for reviewer reliance – clear test objective, control description, population definition, sample selection methodology, test procedures performed, evidence obtained, results, and conclusion. All workpapers go through our 4-tier QC process before delivery. Reviewers consistently report that our documentation reduces their review time by 30–40%.
SOX engagements follow PCAOB AS 2201 with specific requirements for ICFR testing including scope determination, top-down risk assessment, and specific documentation of management's assessment. Non-SOX engagements follow AICPA standards with appropriate scaling of procedures. We adjust test plans, sample sizes, documentation standards, and deliverables based on the engagement type.
Control deficiencies are documented with clear descriptions, root cause analysis, risk implications, and preliminary severity classification. Findings are escalated to your engagement team through your project management system for evaluation and final classification. We never communicate deficiency findings to the client directly – that remains your firm's responsibility.
Entity-level controls are tested through a combination of documentation review, inquiry (conducted by your team with our preparation support), and inspection of evidence such as board minutes, policy documents, and governance materials. We prepare interview guides, document analysis summaries, and evidence matrices that support your team's entity-level control conclusions.

Ready to Accelerate Your Controls Testing?

Get started today and see how much your firm could save with dedicated offshore controls testing specialists.

30-Day Pilot Guarantee
3-Week Deployment
SOC 2 Aligned Security