AP Turnover (Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio)

AP turnover is credit purchases divided by average accounts payable, and the answer is a count of times. See the formula and the two misreads.

Written by AccountablyReviewed by Jugal Thacker, CPA6 minute readUpdated

AP turnover is net credit purchases for a period divided by the average accounts payable balance for that same period. The answer is a count of times rather than days or dollars: it says how many times over the period the average balance owed to suppliers was paid off. Accounts payable turnover ratio and payable turnover ratio name the same measure.

No accounting standard defines it. The figure on top varies, so a count published under this name may have been built on total purchases or on cost of goods sold rather than on credit purchases. The version used has to be stated with the answer or the figure cannot be compared with anything.

The Formula

ap turnover                =  net credit purchases / average accounts payable

average accounts payable   =  (opening payables + closing payables) / 2

Net credit purchases is the period’s buying done on supplier terms, after the returns and allowances recorded against it. Average accounts payable is what the business owed its trade suppliers, measured across the period rather than read at one date, because the numerator covers a stretch of time and a balance sheet reports a single day.

That averaging is a convention rather than a rule. Two dates and twelve month-ends produce different answers on a book with a seasonal peak, so which one went in belongs next to the figure.

Why the Numerator Is Credit Purchases

An invoice can only be turned over if it entered payables in the first place, and a purchase paid immediately never gets there. Put those purchases on top and the count measures payment speed against a balance that never carried them. The same argument runs on the other side of the ledger for the accounts receivable turnover ratio, which is this construction built on credit sales.

Cost of goods sold is the usual substitute, and the reason is availability rather than accuracy. No purchases line appears among the income statement captions a registrant files (17 CFR 210.5-03), so the figure has to be built out of cost of goods sold and the change in inventory, which the cash conversion cycle sets out. What the substitution costs, worked as a spread across all three denominators, sits in the payable period.

Which Payables Belong Underneath

Trade creditors are what belongs underneath, and not the whole reported line. A payables figure lifted off a balance sheet can carry more than supplier invoices, including borrowings and amounts owed to related parties, and what that caption holds is set out in accounts payable. Build the denominator on the reported total and the count stops being about suppliers.

A Worked Example

Say a client’s books for the year carry the figures below.

Purchases on supplier credit, net of returns   1,260,000
Trade payables, opening                          170,000
Trade payables, closing                          190,000

average trade payables   (170,000 + 190,000) / 2  =  180,000
ap turnover              1,260,000 / 180,000      =  7.00
days                     365 / 7.00               =  52.1

Now the same year on a book that carried half those payables balances.

Trade payables, opening                           85,000
Trade payables, closing                           95,000

average trade payables   (85,000 + 95,000) / 2    =  90,000
ap turnover              1,260,000 / 90,000       =  14.00
days                     365 / 14.00              =  26.1

Same suppliers and the same spend, twice the count, and half the days before the money left the business.

Reading the Direction

Higher is not automatically better. The count rises when a business pays faster, and paying faster means handing back credit a supplier had already extended. Federal payment rules make that trade-off explicit for the agencies they bind: an agency shall make payments no more than seven days prior to the payment due date, but as close to the due date as possible, and paying earlier takes a case-by-case determination by the agency head or designee that earlier payment is necessary (5 CFR 1315.4(j)). That rule binds federal agencies rather than a private business, and the part worth carrying across is the stance: paying early is a choice that needs a reason.

Lower is not automatically worse either. A low count can be the terms a business negotiated and is using as intended, or it can be a business that cannot pay, and the ratio cannot tell those two apart. The payable period makes the same point in days, and the two are one relationship read two ways, since dividing the count into the days in the year produces the days form.

What Moves AP Turnover Inside a Firm

Buying moves this count on its own, since purchases sit on top, and a period where buying slows can shift it with nothing in the payment process changing. Holding purchases steady, two separate levers sit behind a change in payment behavior, and only one of them is about efficiency. How quickly an invoice clears approval decides when it is ready to pay; when the payment run releases decides when it actually leaves. Where a firm pays on the date the vendor agreed, approvals can get faster and the count will not move at all. Any reported improvement in payables work should say which of the two moved, a distinction worked through in an accounts payable outsourcing case study.

Common Questions

Read it against the same business in earlier periods and against the terms its suppliers actually granted, never against a target figure. A rise means the average balance was cleared more times, which is the same event as cash leaving sooner. A fall means suppliers funded more of the period, which is exactly what agreed terms are for, unless the business simply cannot pay. Neither direction is a verdict on its own, and what separates the two readings is which invoices are sitting unpaid and for how long.

Divide the count into the day count used for the year, 365 for a calendar year or 360 where a lender or a contract works on a banker's year. The result is days payable outstanding, and the formula behind it, the three denominators that move it and what it is not are set out in the payable period.

There is no authoritative figure, and a number quoted as an industry norm is a house rule rather than a standard. What this count can honestly be measured against is the same business in earlier periods, the payment terms its suppliers actually granted, and another business whose figure was built on the same numerator and the same averaging convention.

Accountably places trained offshore accountants and tax preparers inside US CPA and EA firms, and a trial task puts a block of a firm’s own payables work through full review before anything client facing depends on it.

Related Terms

View All Terms

See how to evaluate an offshore accounting partner before you sign. Download the free guide now.