Conversion Cost

Conversion cost is direct labor plus manufacturing overhead. See the formula, the standard that names it, and why it never adds up with prime cost.

Written by AccountablyReviewed by Jugal Thacker, CPA4 minute readUpdated

Conversion cost is the cost of turning direct materials into finished goods, direct labor plus the manufacturing overhead allocated to production. It is the second half of total manufacturing cost, the half left once direct materials are set aside, and it attaches to units rather than to the period, so it waits in inventory until those units are sold.

The Conversion Cost Formula

Conversion cost           =  direct labor + manufacturing overhead allocated
Total manufacturing cost  =  direct materials + conversion cost

Section 263A, the uniform capitalization rules, defines direct labor costs as the costs of labor that can be identified or associated with particular units or groups of units of specific property produced, and the elements named run past basic compensation to overtime, vacation, holiday and sick leave pay, shift differential and payroll taxes (Treasury Regulation 1.263A-1(e)(2)(i)(B)). Manufacturing overhead is the production share of the indirect pool, the costs no single unit can carry. What that pool holds is sorted in overhead, and its rate, allocation base and normal-capacity limit are worked through in costing overheads.

A Worked Example

Say a manufacturing client closes a month on the figures below, with overhead applied at the predetermined rate rather than at what the pool actually cost.

Direct materials issued into production                 $150,000
Direct labor                                             $96,000
Manufacturing overhead applied                          $144,000

Conversion cost            96,000 + 144,000       =     $240,000
Total manufacturing cost  150,000 + 240,000       =     $390,000
Prime cost                150,000 +  96,000       =     $246,000

Prime plus conversion     246,000 + 240,000       =     $486,000
Excess over the total     486,000 - 390,000       =      $96,000

The excess is direct labor, counted once inside each subtotal. Any gap that opens between overhead applied and overhead incurred is a separate question, and it is split in 2-way variance analysis.

Where the Phrase Comes From

Costs of conversion is the inventory standard’s own wording rather than textbook shorthand. It appears in the sentence that ties fixed production overhead to normal capacity (Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, paragraph 5, as amended by FASB Statement No. 151), and that rule and its consequences belong to costing overheads.

The tax rules name it outright. Under the full absorption method a taxpayer must take all items of direct production cost into inventoriable costs, and the regulation’s own example of the latitude around that requirement is that a taxpayer may treat direct labor costs as part of indirect production costs, for example by use of the conversion cost method, provided all such costs are allocated to ending inventory to the extent paragraph (d) requires (Treasury Regulation 1.471-11(b)(2)(ii)). So conversion cost is more than a management reporting habit. It is a named costing method a manufacturer can carry onto the return, and the parallel latitude in the uniform capitalization rules is worked through in overtime premium.

Where It Shows Up in a Firm’s Work

In process costing direct labor and manufacturing overhead are tracked as one conversion figure, because both are usually incurred evenly across the process while materials typically enter at a single point. A half finished unit can be complete for material and only partly complete for conversion, so equivalent units are computed separately for each. In the close, conversion cost is what the material picks up on its way through work in process to finished goods, and it reaches the income statement when those units sell, along the path set out in overhead.

What Conversion Cost Is Confused With

Prime Cost

Prime cost is direct materials plus direct labor, so the two subtotals share direct labor and each of them counts it once. That is why they never sum to total manufacturing cost, and why a schedule that adds prime cost to conversion cost has to take direct labor back out to reach the total. Direct material is also narrower than the raw materials store, because the traceability test in raw materials sends untraceable material into the overhead pool, where conversion cost picks it up instead.

Cost of Goods Sold

Conversion cost is an input to a unit. Cost of goods sold is what leaves the balance sheet when that unit is sold. A month can carry a heavy conversion cost and a light cost of goods sold, or the reverse, because work in process and finished goods sit between them at each end of the period.

Common Questions

Conversion cost pricing sets a price from conversion cost alone rather than from full cost. It fits an arrangement where the customer furnishes the material, since the seller is then selling only the conversion.

That question belongs to a different term built from the same two words. Cost per conversion is an advertising measure, ad spend divided by the conversions it produced, and it has nothing to do with direct labor or manufacturing overhead.

Accountably places trained offshore accountants and tax preparers inside US CPA and EA firms, and a firm can grade real inventory and close work on its own files through a trial task before any client file moves.

Related Terms

View All Terms

See how to evaluate an offshore accounting partner before you sign. Download the free guide now.