W2 Contract

A W2 contract is temporary work where you stay somebody’s employee. See which of the three parties is the employer for tax, and what that changes on your pay.

Written by AccountablyReviewed by Jugal Thacker, CPA6 minute readUpdated

A W2 contract is a temporary or fixed-term engagement in which the worker is an employee for payroll tax purposes rather than a self-employed contractor, so tax is withheld from the pay and the year ends with a Form W-2 rather than a Form 1099-NEC (IRS, Forms and associated taxes for independent contractors). The word contract describes the length and the assignment, not the tax status.

The IRS draws that line on the forms themselves. Form 1099-NEC is used to report payments made during the tax year to persons not treated as employees, for example independent contractors, for services performed for a trade or business, and it is generally not used to report wages and other compensation paid to employees, which are reported on Form W-2 (IRS, Forms and associated taxes for independent contractors).

Most of these arrangements involve three parties rather than two. A staffing firm or agency hires the worker, places them at a client company that directs the day-to-day work, and runs the payroll. That split is what makes the arrangement worth defining, because the party giving the instructions and the party named on the Form W-2 are usually not the same company.

The Statute Decides Who the Employer Is

For income tax withholding the Internal Revenue Code answers the three-party question directly, and it answers it in favour of whoever controls the money.

The term employer means the person for whom an individual performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as the employee of such person, except that if the person for whom the individual performs or performed the services does not have control of the payment of the wages for such services, the term employer means the person having control of the payment of such wages (26 U.S.C. 3401(d)).

Read the exception rather than the rule, because in a staffing arrangement the exception is the operative half. The client company directs the work and the agency pays the wages, so the agency is the employer for withholding purposes and the agency’s name goes at the top of the Form W-2.

That is also why the year-end statement exists at all. Every person required to deduct and withhold from an employee a tax under section 3101 or 3402, or every employer engaged in a trade or business who pays remuneration for services performed by an employee, must furnish to each such employee a written statement on or before January 31 of the succeeding year, showing the name of that person, the name of the employee, the total wages, and the amounts deducted and withheld (26 U.S.C. 6051(a)). That statement is the Form W-2 the arrangement is named after.

What Changes on the Worker’s Side

Three things, and they all follow from being an employee rather than being in business for oneself.

Income tax and the employee share of Social Security and Medicare come out of each paycheck rather than being paid quarterly by the worker, because the payer is required to deduct and withhold them (26 U.S.C. 6051(a)).

The employer share of those payroll taxes is carried by the agency, not by the worker. A self-employed contractor meets both halves of that charge personally, which is why the two arrangements are not comparable on the headline rate alone.

Business expenses stop being deductible against the income in the ordinary way, because the worker is not carrying on a trade or business as a sole proprietor for this engagement. The contractor route runs the other way, filing a business schedule and computing self-employment tax on it, and the mechanics of that status are in independent contractor.

What a W2 Contract Is Not

It is not a different kind of employment for tax purposes. The worker is an employee, and the ordinary employee rules apply for the length of the assignment. Whether an engagement is short, project-based or open-ended does not change the classification analysis, which runs on the facts of the working relationship rather than on the label the parties put on it, a point covered in independent contractor.

It is not the same as contract to hire. Contract to hire describes an intention, that the client may take the worker onto its own payroll later. A W2 contract describes the tax treatment now. The two often appear in the same job posting and they are answering different questions.

It is not a corp-to-corp arrangement. In a corp-to-corp engagement the worker’s own entity contracts with the agency or client and invoices it, so nothing is withheld and no Form W-2 is issued. That is a business-to-business relationship with an information return at the end of it rather than a payroll relationship.

It is not a guarantee of benefits. Being an employee for tax purposes settles withholding and the year-end form. Health coverage, paid leave and retirement eligibility are separate questions decided by the agency’s own plans and by employment law, and a short assignment can fail an eligibility period that a permanent role would clear.

Where a US Firm Meets It

On the payroll side of a client’s books, the question is which entity is the employer of record for each worker on site, because that is the entity whose returns carry the wages. A worker directed by the client but paid by an agency belongs on the agency’s payroll filings under the control-of-payment rule (26 U.S.C. 3401(d)), and a workpaper that assumes the site is the employer will not reconcile.

On the classification side, the risk sits in the other direction. A firm treating a long-running, exclusively directed worker as a contractor is making a classification call rather than a paperwork choice, and the consequences of getting it wrong are worked through in the two contractor information returns and, for workers outside the United States, in offshore contractor misclassification risk.

Common Questions

Neither is better in the abstract, and the choice is usually not the worker’s to make, because status follows the facts of the relationship rather than a preference. What can be stated plainly is the trade: on a W2 contract the payer withholds and carries the employer share of payroll tax, while a self-employed contractor receives the gross amount, meets both halves of the payroll charge, and deducts business expenses against the income.

Usually the staffing agency, because it controls the payment of the wages. Where the person for whom the individual performs the services does not have control of the payment of the wages, the employer is the person having control of the payment of those wages (26 U.S.C. 3401(d)).

If the engagement is a W2 contract, yes. The payer must furnish the employee a written statement showing the total wages and the amounts deducted and withheld, on or before January 31 of the following year (26 U.S.C. 6051(a)). A self-employed engagement produces an information return instead, and no withholding.

Accountably places trained offshore accountants and tax preparers inside US CPA and EA firms under layered review, and a trial task lets a firm’s own reviewer grade real work before any client file depends on it.

Related Terms

View All Terms

See how to evaluate an offshore accounting partner before you sign. Download the free guide now.